Monday 11 April 2011

Why the French are wrong to ban the burqa.

I don't like religion. Religion leaves a horrible taste in my mouth. I don't like Christians who want everyone to know about it. I don't like what it can do to people in the extreme cases. I don't like the resistance to reasoned debate it breeds - "how dare you challenge my religion" is often used in the same way as "how dare you bring up the death of my child". I don't like the ways in which the Abrahamic religions have stifled our attitudes to sex, and sexual equality for centuries - even secular people are still prone to the sexually repressive values which still permeate Western Europe. I don't like burqas - they are a potent symbol of sexual repression, gender inequality and patriarchy.

Yet I will fight to the death for people's right to have a faith. The far left made a mistake when it took the phrase "opiate of the people" too literally in the twentieth century. Decades of religious oppression and division have left scars across Russia, China and elsewhere which are only beginning to heal. The far left made a mistake in rejecting liberalism. I have always felt that at its heart, the socialist society we on the left seek should be more free and more democratic than any other. There is no one left on the left who wouldn't say that the Soviet Union was a repressive, distopian nightmare state. We agree that liberalism (which protects individuals and communities alike) is, and should remain a core value of the left.

The new threat to the rights of individuals and communities comes from the right. An ever more mainstream and centrist right, which is rejecting its own liberal values and pandering to xenophobia and division. It is not just far right nutters like the EDL, BNP or the French Front National we have to worry about. Cameron has recently claimed that multi-culturalism doesn't work, and wants to instill a so-called "British identity" into our culture (I'll ignore for now my view that there is no unified British identity). Centre-right governments across Europe are making assaults on Islam. The Swiss banned the building of minarets on mosques (yet church spires are fine). The French ban on the burqa came into effect this week.

The French have always had a secular society. It was one of the founding principles of their revolution in the late eighteenth century. There was a strict separation of the church and state - something I agree with. When they banned the wearing of religious items in schools in 2004 (including muslim headscarves), I felt this was perfectly fine. Children ought to have a secular schooling and be allowed to think and choose for themselves when they are old enough. But the banning of the burqa is not secularism, no matter how much the French government hide behind its banner. This ban directly singles out Islam, and it prevents some of its believers from practicing their religion (though, of course not all muslims believe the burqa to be necessary, some do). This is yet more pandering to the right, "security-conscious", xenophobes, racists, Christian fundamentalists. It not only reflects, but in fact serves to intensify hostilities between east and west.

If we really want to be constructive in tackling fundamentalism, perhaps try, y'know, being nice - stop treating the muslim world as an oil well to be invaded when we please, or treating them with suspicion when they come to live in our countries.  If Christians want to practice their religion, then they should expect that others will want to practice theirs - burqas and all, and that atheists like myself may want to have reasoned debates with them. Who knows, maybe we could all learn something from it. As long as everyone practices nicely, in an agression free environment - we're all happy right?

What do you think? We're interested to hear your views on this. If you'd like to write for the leftists, please find all the information in the "Write for the Leftists" tab above.

5 comments:

  1. In principle think the opposite: they were wrong to ban religious symbols (they don't prevent learning), but I understand banning the burqa. The aim of the burqa is to hide a woman's body from the eyes of men - many muslim women do this by wearing long-sleeves, loose clothes and a headscarf, which is fine. I was in school when they banned the headscarves, and they asked me to take off my bandana. T_T
    I don't think the burqa is necessary to be a practising muslim. And, homeland security and feminism aside, how can you interact properly with someone if they can't see your face? I work in childcare, and if the babies I care for don't recognize the person picking them up, they scream. Recognition requires memorization of facial features, which is instinctive btw.

    In practise, I think that if they were going to ban religious symbols anyway, they should have banned the burqa at the same time. It is not only wrong, but stupid, tactless and dangerous to target one religion, and muslims in particular, seven years afterwards. Most French muslims will comply. Some will rebel. And some (the adolescents who couldn't care less about being muslim and just want an excuse to burn stuff, and a small minority of extremists) will go crazy on our asses.

    Well done, Sarkozy, you just signed our death warrant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is interesting Ceallai. I'm now not sure whether you're for or against the ban - you seem to change your mind halfway through.

    I said in the article that I do not like burqas. I think they can be used to oppress women (though their original intent is argued to be the opposite - to allow women to be seen as people and not sex objects), and obviously they pose a security risk. I know there are muslims who don't wear them, and much depends upon the way in which the religion is interpreted. The point is that many muslims do see it as an important part of their faith and their identity. No matter what we might think of burqas, or religion in general, this ban is treading a dangerous line.

    I can tell a Christian that everything he believes in is silly and idiotic and probably give good reasons as to why, but I cannot ban him from believing and practicing those beliefs. This would be a violation of his right to think and speak for himself.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The truth is that I'm not sure myself. Ideologically, I'm for the ban, but politically, I'm against it: it does nothing but harm. I think that if they wanted to ban the burqa (which in principle would be a good idea), they should have done it more tactfully, ie - along with other religious symbols. Singling out one particular community is never, ever a good idea, and with a subject as sensitive as religion, the consequences could be catastrophic.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You say

    'There is no one left on the left who wouldn't say that the Soviet Union was a repressive, distopian nightmare state.'

    Yes there is.

    George Galloway for one. He said in 2002 'If you are asking did I support the Soviet Union, yes I did. Yes, I did support the Soviet Union, and I think the disappearance of the Soviet Union is the biggest catastrophe of my life.'

    ReplyDelete
  5. Maybe I should change this... "There is no one left on the left with any credibility who wouldn't say that the Soviet Union was a repressive, distopian nightmare state".

    George Galloway is inevitably filling the role of token mad lefty for reality TV/ Sky News. I don't think there are many people willing to defend his credibility.

    ReplyDelete